Change in Congress Due To Republicans Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Change in Congress Due To Republicans - Essay ExampleA student examen for drugs for the first time may find it a rather daunting, and emotional experience, but they should be a strugglee(p) that they are not there to judge any of the subjects nor the educational faculty. The student tester must be professional impartial observation, amiability without familiarity, and also the ability to keep their focus in very interrogation circumstances.The student will be assessed in all of these areas, and also upon their ability to understand their role in the testing of teenagers, and the statistical likelihood that any student they meet will test positive for drugs.do drugs testing is a contentious issue, with some seeing the Supreme Courts rulings in cases such(prenominal) as the progress of Education V. Earls (2002), as allowing a much broader invasion of student privacy than ever before others wall that students should be required to submit to urine testing as part of the ever pressi ng war on drug workout in America. As early as April 1999, Congress had been under change magnitude pressure to implement drug tests in schools, with Representatives arguing thatIncreasing public concern about the nature of drug use in and around schools made the government choose a selective insurance policy of urine testing to reassure parents that students were not taking drugs in class. It has been claimed that High School Senior Surveys shows a decline in drug use since the 1979, and that daily use of marijuana has fallen From 10.3% to 4.0% (Morgan, 1988). His conclusion, that marijuana use has slumped (Declined significantly), does not stem fear about student use of the drug, and this is what must be borne in mind when considering the role of routine urine testing in school additions. Testing in Schools speckle many object to the use of random drug testing as a condition of admission to school, which is prohibited anyway as the school is a public body, this is not the ca se for extracurricular pastimes such as sports. The Supreme Court also noted thatStudents are required to submit to physical examinations and Vaccinations which indicates that students concur a lesser privacyinterest than the general public.(Missouri Centre, 2002)Moreover, while there is some evidence that dose testing of any kind, including for cause or suspicion, was notA significant predictor of Marijuana use. (Yamaguchi, et al, 2003ii) flake drug testing is a standard procedure in sporting competitions and in the workplace it should not therefore be seen as an over zealous requirement. Drug-testing in schools and the workplace is not simply about individual behaviour (Campbell, 2004, 86), it is, of course, also about the control that the school has over the children in its care. It is a schools certificate of indebtedness to act as loco parentis and to enforce the law. Concerns over the invasion of a childs privacy during urine testing is dependant upon the idea of close obse rvation of the child making the specimen, and then handing over this specimen to be tested by strangers (Boire, 2004). Of course, issues of trust also make things difficult Routine drug testing implies, not merely that the tester mistrusts one student (Bailey, 1997, 5), but the entire generation. It may also make students more(prenominal) reluctant to participate in outside-hours activity - with the